Water and Agri (cultural) Terrorism In India
Part – 1
Dams, Fertilizers, Chemicals
destruction of communities by starvation and disease
Shri
Kidambi ,Krishna Vayuvegula and
Rakesh Mishra for
GPPSI and UPI
"There are two ways to
conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword.. The other is by debt."
--John Adams 1826, United States President, Freedom Fighter who fought British
for American Indepedence.
"It
is impossible to 'earn' interest without creating poverty and debt in first
place."
Introduction
Considering socio-economic aspect of Gangaji and other rivers will be remained underestimated if we do not count the manipulations made by the pre - independence and post independence economic superpowers and their puppets of the Indian mainstream.
From the time of dinosaraus (recently discovered in INDIA in all Alluvial River Deltas and their destruction is attributed volcanic eruptions that created hundreds of river deltas as opposed to ‘interplanetary banging of earth’) till our surrender to British East India Company during 1820-1857 India was the FOOD BOWL of world. The crops were diverse and balanced, enough was produced to feed the then whole population of India, almost everything was organically grown (no fertilizers or pesticides or chemicals or Genetically modified organisms) soil was rich, soil fertility self replenishing, rivers were usual flowing, no dams, no flooding civilian areas, none occupied catchment areas, rains were coming properly, seasonally.
Here we examine how from such a stage of self sufficient, environmentally intelligent, eco-friendly river delta agricultural management of uncivilized barbarians (a term usually used to refer us Indians Africans and Asians, by British including their honorable prime minister Winston Churchill) we progressed steadily in destruction of agriculture and our rivers since the occupation of British, but with great speed when British left (translation: after independence) in to such eco disastrous, environment damaging, river destroying, community wiping agricultural practices in just 60 years. Did we do this to ourselves deliberately consciously or under pressure from world bank agri MNCs ? Or it started with the British themselves as depopulation of any country they occupied was their principle policy to grab resources. In continental USA the British deliberately distributed chicken pox, small pox bacteria laced blankets to the local Indian communities so that everyone was dead and their lands properties wealth could be occupied. In India they cannot do that as we proved tough match to be defeated just like that thanks to thousands or year old Royalty and kingdoms. So after British gained a foot hold in India steadily started to disturb, undermine and destroy the strength of India, its people, their values, their cultural bonds and most important the source of all the above Rivers. This is common anywhere where there are rivers in the world. The process of this understanding of rivers and agriculture and destroying them by British first (and later undermining by our own for political agendas) in any country is termed as Cultural Anthropology or Behavioral (Alluvial) Sociology. Both of these fields of knowledge study how the river flow affects culture and wealth of communities thus sociological relations among various sections of society. By understanding this thoroughly, the river flow can be disturbed which directly effects changes among the social order.
Agri (culture) & Cultural
Anthropology & Behavioral (Alluvial) Sociology
The science of understanding
flow of Rivers, Societies and Conflicts.
Alluvial Sociology as
basis of Ethno Genesis conflicts
Stage I
The civilization its development reaction response pattern basically
depends on the connectivity established with the river banks over which they
evolved.
If the River Flow
is congenial to the commercial traffic all the way from the beginning of the river to the
merging with the sea homogeneous cultures and food habits develop. Nile,
US River based Indians, Western and Eastern Indian Civilizations are all
examples of the fact.
If the river flow is violent and passes through mountain areas or thick jungles then totally isolated communities develop with little interaction. Tribal societies along Euphrates, Amazon. Brahmaputra etc are examples of this.
It is imperative to understand these differences before conquering
the territories-resources and people.
For example British bombed tribal resistance in Somalia or Iraq during
1900-1945, with No nation wide response of larger mobilizations.
First disturb
deface and destroy (DDD) rivers and river flows thus wiping of river based
ecological systems in villages, forcing unemployment and thus vertical mobility
for urbanization. The rise in urban unemployment and unhygienic conditions will
become a breeding ground for rise in crime or if properly groomed for
revolutions and regime changes. The
science of blocking the flow of the rivers- Community destruction, massive
fertilizer pesticide consumption, poverty creation, water wars, national state
conflicts and food dependency became a norm in liberalized and privatized world.
This became a
official hidden doctrinal basis of the redrawing the geography and re
colonization of the territories of Asia and Africa and of course India post WW
2 in the form of Liberalization and Privatization.
Stage II - Engineering social shifts.
By blocking [read damming]
uninterrupted river flow the homogeneity and continuity of populations can be
broken, thus inducing mobility or changing the occupational habits and cultural
values including food habits vertically read urbanization. Alluvial flow of the
rivers is the one that grinds the minerals soils medicinal curst layers by rain
waters that fall on forests and mountain tops and nourishes soil when river
flow comes down stream. These fertile lands does not need any other artificial
fertilizers. But once they are dammed or
course is altered then the fertile sediments will get struck at the base of
dams and year by year thus reduce the available flow of water and rich
mineralization of and rejuvenation of soil and alters moisture contents in the
down stream. The low lands will starve of nourishments and the cynical cycle of
artificial Fertilizer utilization increases but will definitely fail crops in
the long run as the farmers will loose for the corporate game of ever
increasing fertilizer costs and will be forced to abandon and move in to
urbanization. This reduces Land cultivated and makes groups and nations depend
on MNCs for food production and in the last decade on seeds for cultivation.
Second dangerous process of damming
rivers is the disease generation at the dam sites where with stored stagnant
water mosquito colonies increase. Also during the entire course of river down
stream to dams (which now with dams looks like disconnected ponds or lakes or
pools of muddy water) the same phenomenon occurs increasing the mosquito prone
diseases in the entire populations along the river. These are like dengue,
malaria, swine flu, encephalitis. The land starves with out fertilizers and placer
minerals making the farming community depend on artificial fertilizers
pesticides controlled by war MNCs graduation in to post war scenario –alternate
use of chemicals of war as fertilizers. In Hyderabad alone the mosquito
containment costs are close to Rs 100 crores diverting valuable public funds
for uncalled for diseases benefitting again medical MNCs.
This loss of soil
fertility and reduced water flow happened when Aswan high dam was built. Finally Egypt has created Nile Dredging
Corporation to transport the sediment to the low lands as fertilizer and now
many third world countries thinking to un dam the rivers like Brazil.
Stage III
Minionism or Re- constructionism
Minionism or
Re-constructionism is a process by which, within an ethnic group, using either sub-ethnicity
(in case of India caste and sub cast) religion or language homogeneity (or all
of them) to achieve political ends that suits either local national political
ends or International players resource strategies. This is more applicable in
post world war scenario where the colonies became independent and want to
pursue their own economic political goals.
If Language is used
as basis of minionism
it is Linguistic Re- constructionism
–
2 Languages
2 Religions ONE country LTTE
Sinhala rift here religion is used as catalyst
1 Language
ONE country Different religions- Iraq- Shia Sunni Kurd all speak
Arabic but religion is used as catalyst
East Timor,
Indonesia-Same language Christian Muslim rift was used as catalyst.
1 Language One
Country One Religion-Korea North and South Divide here economic ideology was
used as catalyst
India
One Language One
State Same religious economic ethnicity composition
UP split in to
Uttaranchal Linguist accent is used as catalyst
AP agitations for separate state Linguist accent is used as catalyst
MH Vidharbha Linguist accent is used as catalyst
If Religion is used
as basis of minionism then it is called Religious
Re- constructionism
Shia Sunny fights in
Iraq (Islamic Re- constructionism)
If ethnicity is used as basis it is Ethno Linguist Re-constructionism
Somali Sudan Ehiopia
Tribal Fights Ethno Religious-Linguistic Re- constructionism
If Economic Ideology is used as basis of
minionism it is called ideological
Re – Constructionism.
Bolshivik, Communist,
Soviet, Mao Thought, Naxalism, Marxism, Leninism.
The weakest in all
the above major re-constructionisms is
the process based on Economic Ideology.
The post-independence
basis of the various re-constructionisms
in India might have stemmed from either genuine or assumed concerns. But the
wrong labeling or wrong handling them lead to a greater danger of Disintegration and political
instability.
BJP RSS Jansangh - Hindu
Re-constructionism projected as Right wing Fundamentalist
Congress -
Muslim/Christian Re-constructionism
projected as Secular Politics
NE Tribal
insurgencies Christian Re-constructionism
projected as Separatist
Freedom FightsMaoism Naxalism and
other related insurgencies Projected as Law & Order Problems
RIVERS including GANGAJI: the SOURCE OF WEALTH
Interestingly people
are what they eat daily ? What they eat daily is the realm of agriculture. The
extent of the agriculture depends on the un obstructed river flows and that is
why all civilizations developed along with flow of the rivers. Rivers are used
for three purposes water (drinking and agrarian) transportation (upstream to
down stream travel) river eco-system commerce and of lately for electricity
generation. Commerce is two types what is produced in the river (fish, shrimp
algae etc) what is brought by the river (rare earth metals, gold, diamonds,
sedimentation containing trace or placer deposits of every known mineral useful
as natural fertilizer for crops. These above three are the common bonds for all
those living along the river side from the beginning of the rivers to the delta
where they merge with the sea.
Only those rivers
bring diamonds or gold which are formed on the sedimentation of volcanic
eruptions lava flows. The soil they haul is called alluvial soil. Rivers in
North South America Africa and India are capable of such things. Europeans
first observed this rivers as carriers of rare metals and diamonds after their
contact with Africa. This was the beginning of the Great Gold Rush (read as
Gold Loot) that resulted in the destruction of Africa. The same Rush was
exhibited in Americas, Spanish Gold Rush to south America, California Gold
Rush, Texas Gold Rush, Great Canadian Gold rush all resulted in the large Human
Depopulation ecological disasters for Gold and other metals that rivers bring.
Till this point all knew gold is gold and diamonds are diamonds-ornamental
significance. So who ever found them were the keepers of them or sellers of
them. The rivers were bringing fresh diamonds gold particles along with water
and fish and all are happy. In fact the rivers need to flow properly otherwise
the gold and diamonds cannot be mined. All this situation changed with the
discoveries of uses of Diamonds and Gold. (This
part of gold diamonds their applications and the destruction of rivers by
damming and destroying delta ecologies is discussed in part two along with
Genetically Modified Organisms)
Agri (culture) destruction, War Greed and Bad
Science called Agronomy / Agribusiness
:The Beginning
VERTICLE 1 –NPK
Around 1860 Justus
Von Liebig, German Scientist &
Chemist (Father of Chemical Agriculture) accidentally discovered that burnt ashes of plant
will nourish plant. And concluded that the composition of burned ashes helped
plant nourishment. That chemical composition of ash found by the scientist
became known as Nitrogen Phosphorous and Potash or (Potassium
Carbonate) or today NPK
In 1875 as he accepted he made a mistake in
analysis and recommended to revert back to organic fertilizers that nourish
soil completely.
German Businessmen unable to colonize any African
or Asian country as they entered late in to colonial conquest rather focused on
the above new business of NPK. They found many German rock salts are a variates
of the above (Muriates) potash. An industry propped up to ground these salts
and throw on crops under the Business
Concept of PP - Profit and Patriotism
150 years later still we use the
same though the same scientist requested to discard that within 15 years.
VERTICLE 2 –
PHOSPHATE AND SUPER PHOSPATE
For 2000 years Egyptians and Romans used powdered bones for growth of
PLANTS. In 1861 Sea Based
Calcium Phosphate was discovered. It was so believed that it was nothing but
bones of Dead Animals and thus bone powder nourishes plants. With adding
Sulphuric acid the super phosphate is created.
Bones (Calcium) + Sulphuric Acid = Super Phosphate
With abundance of Sea
based Calcium Phosphate, industrial launch of Super Phosphate occurred.
VERTICLE 3 – ALKALIS
Arabs used Sea Bleach called Alkali derived from Salt water Plant ashes
and used it in cleaning. Its chemical
composition was understood by 1890 and
then all alkali compounds were made by British company United Alkali Corporation which
became in 1891 Imperial Chemical
Industries.
NEXT 10 Years so many
GERMAN industries launched making Super Phosphate and Potash and dumping all that on unsuspecting farmers and farm
lands as fertilizer.
In 1865 Liebig
DECLARED that non longer HUMUS (Organic Manure Earth worms etc) necessary for
Agriculture as there was initial spur of crop productivity. “there is not
the shadow of proof that either of them exerts any influence on the growth of
plants either in the way of nourishment or otherwise”
By 1875 the agricultural productivity started
declining and more and more fertilizer
was needed. from 1865 to 1875 Von Ludwig studied this phenomenon and in 1875
Von Ludwig Declared that it is the HUMIC ACID THAT AIDS THE PLANTS
GROWTH NOT POTASH or
SUPEER PHOSPHATE.
“the
secret to fertilizing soil precisely lay in this organic excreta of earth based
organisms, not the chemicals”
INDUSTRY JUST
IGNORED HIM AS THEY HAVE ALREADY INVESTED LOT OF MONEY IN
TO POTASH AND SUPER PHOSPHATE MAKING INDUSTRIES SINCE 1855 till 1875.
VERTICLE 4 – BENZENE RING & MILLION CHEMICALS
William Henry Perkins
a British Chemist discovered
the process of creating Mauve Dye from Benzene. It is first Aniline Dye used
in coloring. 1890 Frederick Von
Kekule a German Chemist discovered the Benzene Ring and found multiple ways of creating Chemical compounds
with much deadlier effects.
VERTICLE 5 – AMMONIA NH4
1905
Fritz Haber first synthesized Ammonia NH 4 in laboratory setting. It is used in explosives. Carl Bosch first
created Synthetic Ammonia Plant paved way for explosive industry which
became the cause of Germany launching World War 1 in 1914 – 1919 for domination
in colonies which were denied to them due to their late entry. Concept :
Patriotism and Profit. Ammonium Nitrate explosives killed more than 600 000
during world war 1.
1919 – 1939 This Nitrogen and Ammonia by these companies
dumped on the Crops all across Europe and Africa by these companies offering
incentives to farmers from war time profits. This weakened the resistance of
crops paving the way for ever widening toxic Chemical synthesis thanks to
Benzene Ring.
1925 – Post war US
and GERMAN CHEMICAL COMPANIES MERGED to form I G FARBEN
VERTICLE 6 – DDT
1939 PAUL MUELLER
invented DDT and sold the same to ALLIES. This killed with astonishing speed all BUGS to
keep soldiers in the trenches from filthy conditions and infectious diseases
during Second world war this DDT is used
indiscriminately. As during world war II as all labor of western countries
(mostly American) moved to war with the labor shortage the farmers started
using Deadly chemicals to keep bugs away as substitute and mechanized the whole
farming in USA. The explosives made by these chemicals killed close to 6 000
000 in WW II, 10 Times more than the number killed in WW I
Inter War Years 1919-
1939 and 1945 – 1965
Winners USA has war time profits and losers Germans
produced Eminent scientists chemists etc. This led to an economic development
model.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MODEL
OIL CHEMICALS PESTICIDES EXPLOSIVES GUNS
War Time Profits – Free Money
to
B A N K S
Loan to
Chemical Companies Agricultural
Pesticide Companies Mechanization
Companies
Offered
Credit Facilities offered credit facilities
Government
Subsidies Government Subsidies
To Farmers to
Farmers
This Increased
Consumption of Pests Fertilizers Exponentially. Plants Weakened attracted More
Bugs and Pests and Pesticide Resistant Bugs. To contain them more Chemicals
Needed with CHLORINE DERIVATIVES, Chlordane, Heptachlor, Dieldrin, Aldrin, ENDRINE
(The leading Cause of Suicide in India)
and Organic Phosphates Parathion & Malathion were produced.
Between 1945 – 1968 post
war era 18 American ammonia making giant chemical companies were forced to find
alternative uses of Ammonia Fluorine etc leading among them are Du Pont, Dow
Chemicals, Monsanto, American Cyanamide, IG Farben etc.
All companies dumped these
chemicals on Agriculture farms and dumped fluorine in water cleaning treatment
and worst in tooth pastes. European companies dumped the chemicals in Africa
and USA in North and South Americas.
When Awareness raised
and Latin America and Africa Resisted
then they Dumped Every thing
on I N D I A between 1968 - 1975.
Chemical Fertilizer
Consumption in India from
1901- 1968 was 3.5 kilos per hectare (1 ½ Acres) or total country consumption
was 1.1 million tons. By 1975 it became 50 kilos per hectare and country
Consumption went to a whopping 50 Million Tons. One of the prime reasons
for this was World Bank applied pressure to allow STANDARD OIL OF CALIFORNIA its subsidiary
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS AND CHEMICALS and forced Government to back
farm credit, give loans to farmers, subsidize chemicals. In case of India rather
than war Profits, Public Tax Money Was siphoned as subsidies for paying
International fertilizer companies. From then there was no turning back.
Whatever was rejected in Europe USA and Africa was dumped on unsuspecting
Indians with disastrous consequences.
BRITISH STUDY PROVED IN INDIA THAT ORGANIC FARMING WAS AND IS BEST
(1914-1945 study)
Surprisingly during
the peak growth of Fertilizer Industry
the British Government in India done conducted the Largest Study
comparing in real time for more than 40 years since 1914-1945. This study was
made to found which form of agriculture was or is going to be best.
SIR (I do not want to
call any British who raped this country Sir but in this case even I have to
make an exception because the work he did deserves that as he earned in proving
thousands of years of our agricultural practices) ALBERT HOWARD, Imperial
Chemist Botanist, Government of British Raj, Author of “The Soil and Health” worked from Pusa,
Agri Facility in Samastipur Bihar. He Conducted Research in to the
comparison of Chemical Fertilizer Farms versus Organic Bio Fertilizer/Bio dynamic
farms/ Vermi compost Farms, Organic Food Vs Chemical Fertilizer Food and
cattle fee.,
The conclusions were
never available in India nor his book. Some of the startling findings are as
follows.
Cattle fed on Organic
feed are resistant for Hoof and Mouth Disease & Mad Cow & other
infections. Even today Ongole Bull Semen is smuggled to US Brazil as it is only
breed resistant for Mad cow disease.
Cattle fed on
Ammonia/Sulphate break out of disease within 5 years.
In
humans and animals Organic Food brings Immunity to Parasitic Activity, Degenerative
Disease Immunity, Preventive of occurring diseases, Creative of
New energies
Chemicals leave
imperfectly synthesized protein in lever causing all diseases.
CONCLUDED IN 1945 CHEMICALS IN FARMIG WAS WASTE OF
MONEY.
Resistance mounted
from 1919 for chemical usage in Agriculture in USA and Europe. After comprehensive
study from 1948 to 1968 Italian Scientist Amerigo Mosca winner of Chemistry
Prize in Brussels world Science fair, proved beyond doubt in 1975 in his report
to ITALIAN GOVERNMENT that Farm
Chemicals are Radiomimetic (imitates radio active materials) Effects
are similar to Radiation. (these include fungicides of organic synthesis like Zineb,
Captan, Phaltan etc.) All Chemicals and fertilizers dumped on Africa during
that period are equivalent to 29 H Bombs of 14 M.Tons or 14500 A Bombs of
Hiroshima Type
By 1970 USA produced 453 000 Tons of Chemicals (fertilizers) equivalent to 145 H Bombs of 14 M. Tons, 72
000 A Bombs of Hiroshima Type.
The effects documented
by the study was startling.
From 1945 to 1975, Mentally Retarded Children in Live Births increased
15%, 30% sperm count down in productive males (because of chlorinated
hydrocarbon pesticidies like RCB DDT) 25% of the male college students became Sterile.
This report was classified by Italian and US governments at the
request of ITALIAN CHEMIAL FERTILIZER
GIANT MONTEDISON now Glossed off and forgotten.
USA In perspective
United states got the
first independence from the oppressive British rule in the late part of 18th
century. From the day one US want to act
as a bastion of freedom from the oppressed British rule. They rapidly expanded
in to agriculture taming the greatest rivers like Missisipi Missouri etc.
Thousands of earth works and dams are built all across the country from the
beginning of 19th century. Precisely 79 000 dams (small medium and
big). They more than 100 years to observe and learn the damage or benefits
caused by dams. Finally with advances of
technologies in hydrology river management ecology and environmental science
and high pressure physics the US decided to take a new path of water
management. Since 1945 post war US took the lead in demolishing already
constructed dams. They dismantled thousands of dams. In the last decade (2001-2012)
they de commissioned more than 975 dams at a pace of 100 dams per year. This
was possible for one reason dam building was in the hands of private hands.
They realized that the operative costs of maintaining dams is more than cheap
alternatives available in the erstwhile benefits of dams.
The economics, too,
are often questionable. Big dams are prone to cost overruns: as much as 30% on
average, calculates Mc Cully. The
irrigation gains they produce may be more than offset by the loss of the fertile
land they inundate. Supposed recreational benefits are often hugely overstated.
The costs of resettling people are not fully accounted for. And even the
hydropower that big dams offer is less useful than their builders claim.
Because dams do not last that long, say greens, it is wrong to treat such
energy as renewable.
However, as society
has come to understand, dams can cause significant social and environmental
impacts that outweigh the benefits they provide. By design, dams alter the natural flow regime, and with it virtually every aspect of a river ecosystem, including water quality, sediment transport and deposition, fish migrations and reproduction, and riparian and floodplain habitat and the organisms that rely on this habitat.
Dams also require ongoing maintenance. For example, reservoirs in sediment-laden streams lose storage capacity as silt accumulates in the reservoir. In arid climates reservoirs also experience a high rate of water loss to evaporation. Dams also can have significant economic impacts on dam owners (private owners of governments, in India we have to borrow from world bank to maintain dams) the surrounding community and society in general. As dams age, maintenance costs and safety hazards often increase, resulting in an increasing financial burden and liability on the dam owner. Depending on the river and the fisheries being impacted by the dam, an owner may also be required to retrofit the structure with fish passage facilities or make other upgrades to comply with water quality standards.
When
dams diminish fisheries, communities can lose jobs and sustenance,
or the source of their cultural or spiritual life. This is the greatest
realization on the part of Americans that Rivers and agri (Culture) goes hand
in hand. However, as society has come to understand, dams can cause
significant social and environmental impacts that outweigh the benefits they provide
.
“The consensus among river
ecologists is that dams are the single greatest cause of the decline of river
ecosystems”
World Commission on Dams. Dams and Development:
A New Framework for Decision-Making. Cape Town, 2000.
Because of these and
other concerns, some dam owners and managers or governments are finding that it
makes more sense to remove certain dams,
often benefiting the community ecologically and socially, rather than make
costly repairs or upgrades. Also it was documented the River will come to life within 6 months removing all pollutants in it that were done by humans taking them in to sea thus stabilizing them and the entire river eco system will revert back to its original levels of before damming.
Americans are the first to revert to Organic farming. Though their MNCs are pumping the world with deadly industrial chemicals inside their country they created so much regulatory and activist mechanism that prevented use of harm full chemicals in many areas that could end up in human or agricultural consumption. (The politics of bottling companies MNCs to dominate control of water in world and American government regulatory policies is a totally separate discussion. What they donot do in USA will do every where in world).
Power Generation
Dams are built for
power generation. US alone demonstrated by increasing end user efficiency and
using emerging technologies they can substitute 75% of their hydro electrical
power.
Flood Plain management
As floodplain managers, state resource
agencies and local communities wrestle with the problems associated with
flood-control dams; cities around the country are implementing innovative
techniques for managing floods without new dams. While many of these
alternatives are not quick fixes, they are real solutions that can be
implemented with long-term planning. The following are some alternative
approaches to dams for flood management:
• Reducing
runoff
• Riparian
& in-river flood management
• Separating the people & the threat
Water Diversion
- the Primary purpose of Dams (human agricultural purposes)
A primary purpose of many dams, both large
and small, is to facilitate water diversions. Although existing water supplies
can be stretched much further and new water infrastructure can be delayed using
water conservation and efficiency strategies described below, people will
continue to divert
water from rivers and other surface sources
for various purposes.
Nearly 80 percent of water consumed in the
United States comes from surface supplies—rivers, creeks and lakes.1 In
California alone, there are more than 25,000 points of diversion from streams.2
Thus, there are at least 25,000 locations in the state at which fish and other
river organisms can be
harmed in the process of meeting our need
for water. In many dam investigations, the question comes down to: could we
still divert water if the dam is removed or modified, or not built at all? In
many cases, the answer is yes.
Several, more river-friendly alternatives
to traditional permanent dam diversion methods are discussed below, including:
• Infiltration
galleries and wells
• Screened
pipe intakes
• Seasonal
dams
• Consolidated diversions
Nigerian activist Nnimmo Basse,
winner of the prestigious Right Livelihood Award launched a movie production
series documenting the effects of dams all across the world. The
production was launched today at the COP17 climate meeting in Durban. The video
and tour allow viewers to explore why dams are not the answer to climate
change, by learning about topics such as reservoir emissions, dam safety, and
adaptation while visiting real case studies in the Amazon, Africa, and the
Indian and Pakistani Himalayas.
Between 1939-1969, Louis
Bloomfield, author of Rains Came, came to India learned about Humus, Plant Nutrition, Soil Management,
Came to Pleasant Valley, OHIO, USA, and Started Malabar Farm. Lady
Eve Balfour, Published The Living Soil. Despite resistance from giant Agri
Multinationals Americans steadily progressed in replacing at least in their
country the food with organic produce components.
CHINA in perspective
In the year 1936, J I
Rodate founder of magazine Organic Gardening and Farming reported after
studying the Chinese farming practices that CHINA only with Organic Farming feeding 100 Million Cattle, 300 Million Hogs, 600 Million People during that period.
The only reason China building three Gorges dam was to loot Gangotri
basin water reserves and store that for future purposes.
EU in perspective
From the beginning
there were no huge dams in EU for electricity. France gets 80% of its energy
needs from nuclear energy. Rivers are managed more on the lines of Americans.
In the field of organic farming and feeding they are forefront in research and
development.
BRAZIL in perspective
Brazil is the first
country to create an environmental police to protect Amazon river from being
dammed. Brazil is the country that pushed bio fuels and organic farming as
alternate to chemicals.
India in perspective post liberalization
Towards Agriculture
Dependency- 2005 Green
Revolution ideology-or Agriculture 123
KIA 2006 Indo US Knowledge Initiative on
Agricultural Education Research Service and Commercial Linkages. This is a push
by US Agri MNCs not by the US activists. This is the important difference. The
entire GMO etc that US does not want will be dumped in India.
- Reinforces Private Researchers in Agriculture b. US private interests in Driver seat of our Agricultur
These two will decide
the future priorities of Central ICAR (Indian Council on Agricultural Research) and State run Agricultural Universities Indian
agriculture should move towards business orientation increased US penetration.
To get this happen Scientists in Agricultural research should re
construct their orientation towards US business model and Farmers should
lend their fields for experimentation
- Internships in areas of bio technology through collaboration like Bharti-Wal Mart
- April 2008 - Pigeon Pea Genomics Initiative - internships Collaboration on drought resistant Rice and Wheat.
- Research around Casava, Potato, banana, papaya.
- Contract Farming and Bio fuels.
- De institutionalization of Research
- Farmer led scientist assisting Research – to private interest led corporate sponsored farmer participating
(Kanchi Kohli,
Kalpavriksh, Environmental Action Group, Shalini Bhutani, GRAIN, NGO
as reported in 2008 Sep 18. HTI).
On the front of Dams
we want to borrow from world bank to maintain our dams or repair our dams.
English companies are consultants for this and Australian companies will teach
us how to manage dams and the ecology and remove pollution of our rivers at a
whopping cost of Rs 35 000 crores only for Ganaga River alone. There are two
similar attempts done by Indians under Ganga Action Plan 1 (Rs 1000 crores) and
Gap 2 (with Rs 10000 crores). Now this time it is Rs 35 000 crores for Ganga
alone. That too IIT are romped in for authenticity by foreign MNCs. Now IIT
rarely teach a combined curriculum of River Ecology, Fisheries, Alluvial
Sociology, Agricultural development together.
(On Genetically Modified Organisms and dams to
control critical resources the next article discusses).
Very Nice...
ReplyDelete